After killing the man lied about minor details of a mother Yuanhuang truth exposed (video)-mcncc

After killing the man lied about minor details of a mother Yuanhuang truth exposed Yangzi Evening News Network (correspondent reporter Zhu Dingzhao July J. snow bridge) last year 12 month 3 day afternoon, in the cafe after the murder, Huai’an man Cheng Xiaojun (a pseudonym) in the public security organs confessed that the birth 1998 years 3 months 5 days, the case will soon be handed over to the Huai’an City procuratorate for examination and prosecution of juvenile criminal procuratorial department, in the review stage, the age of Cheng Xiaojun let prosecutors voice doubts: because according to preliminary examination, student registration card is Cheng Xiaojun June 9 1997 2, if the student card record is true, he was grown in 3 months. The procuratorial organs through various efforts, and ultimately from the neonatal vaccination registration card to determine the true age: he was born in September 2, 1997, when the incident is an adult, 29 reporters from the Huaian municipal procuratorate, the prosecution, Cheng Xiaojun eventually because of intentional homicide and sentenced to life imprisonment, and his mother was arrested for perjury by handling the case. The young Internet killer, whether he is adult mystery review is an important link for the age of minors in criminal cases, in the case of Huaian city procuratorate prosecutor told reporters that the actual age of the defendant, the principle should be to the household registration management of the registration organ shall prevail, but due to various reasons, sometimes age and actual registration the age is not consistent between the evidence may be contradictory, which often makes the original simple case becomes perplexing. According to the Huaian municipal procuratorate prosecutors introduced the process of murder cases of Internet cafes throughout the video monitoring process of science, the network chats, the suspect confessed and many witness testimony as evidence of intentional homicide, he clear facts. In February 16th this year, transferred to the juvenile criminal prosecution department of the hospital to review the prosecution, he was in the case of minors is also the key to the case. Due to the prudence and sensitivity of the age issue, the prosecutor of the case requires the public security organs to reinforce Cheng Xiaojun’s age evidence and provide his birth certificate and the original household registration form. According to the investigation, the original Cheng Xiaojun registration form was lost in the process of administrative division change. Cheng Xiaojun’s father suffered from depression, and the police focused on asking his mother to become a certain person. She said she was in a distant relatives gave birth to Cheng Xiaojun, because the child is afraid of being fine, did not dare to give birth in hospital, naturally there is no birth certificate. The two most proven evidence is missing, and the prosecutor guides the police to investigate from Cheng Xiaojun’s school card. Police transferred Cheng Xiaojun’s primary and junior high school cards, of which the primary school enrollment card was registered, and the date of birth was September 2, 1997. If the student card records true, when the incident Cheng Xiaojun has been 3 months of adulthood. Student card records may not appear out of nowhere, real age may have hidden history science. Prosecutors questioned Cheng Xiaojun again with doubt. At this time, he was still regarded as a minor, accompanied by his mother as a trial. Prosecutors are trying to avoid age issues, questioning Cheng Xiaojun’s upbringing. When it comes to children’s playmates, Cheng Xiaojun says, "uncle’s children are smaller than themselves."." In the previous confession and testimony, all records Cheng Xiaojun uncle’s children bigger than him. Prosecutors are keen to capture this contradiction, following the corpse

男子杀人后谎称未成年母亲圆谎 一个细节暴露真相扬子晚报网讯(通讯员 月佼 雪桥 记者 朱鼎兆)去年12月3日下午,在网吧杀人后,淮安男子程小军(化名)在公安机关供述称其出生1998年3月5日,案件很快被移交到淮安市检察院未成年人刑事检察处审查起诉,在审查阶段,程小军的年龄让检察官心声疑窦:因为根据前期审查,程小军的学籍登记卡是1997年9月2日,若学籍卡记录为真,案发时他已成年3个月。检察机关通过多方努力,最终从其新生儿接种疫苗登记卡确定他真实年龄:出生于1997年9月2日,案发时已是成年人,记者29日从淮安市检察院获悉,经该院公诉,程小军终因故意杀人罪被判无期徒刑,而他的母亲则因涉嫌伪证罪也被立案处理。少年网吧杀人,他是否成年成谜“年龄审查是办理未成年人犯罪案件中的重要环节”,负责该案的淮安市检察院检察官告诉记者,认定被告人的实际年龄,原则上应当以户籍管理机关的登记为准,但由于种种原因,有时登记的年龄与实际并不一致,年龄证据之间也可能自相矛盾,这往往使原本简单明了的案子变得错综复杂。据淮安市检察院检察官介绍,程小军杀人案件过程有网吧全程监控视频、当事人网络聊天记录、嫌疑人供述和多位证人证言等为证据,他故意杀人的事实清楚明了。今年2月16日移送到该院未成年人刑事检察处审查起诉时,他在案发时到底是不是未成年人也成为该案关键。出于对年龄问题的审慎与敏感,办案检察官要求公安机关对程小军其年龄证据进行补强,提供其出生证明和原始的户籍登记表。经调查得知,程小军户籍登记表原件在行政区划变动过程中遗失。程小军父亲患有抑郁症,警方重点询问了他的母亲成某。她说当年她在一个远房亲戚家生下了程小军,因为是二胎怕被罚款,没敢在医院分娩,自然也就没有出生证明。最具证明力的两份证据均缺失,检察官又指导警方从程小军的学籍卡入手侦查。警方调取了程小军小学和初中的学籍卡,其中小学学籍卡上登记其出生日期为1997年9月2日。若学籍卡记录为真,案发时程小军已成年3个月。学籍卡上的记录不可能凭空冒出来,程小军的真实年龄可能有隐情。检察官带着疑问再次提审了程小军。此时他依然被当作未成年人,由母亲成某陪同接受审讯。检察官有意避开年龄问题,从程小军的成长经历问起。提到小时候的玩伴时,程小军说了一句:“大伯家的孩子比自己小。”而在此前的供述和证言中,均记录程小军大伯家的孩子比他大。检察官敏锐地捕捉到这一矛盾,继续追问下去,成某却在一旁咳嗽了几声,程小军见状立刻不作声,接下来不管检察官怎样讯问,他对年龄问题的回答都含糊不清。程小军母亲的一声咳嗽让检察官更加怀疑其真实年龄。接种疫苗日期,让他终获无期母子二人的异常加深了检方的怀疑,多年的办案经验使他们相信,其中很可能有猫腻!提审遇阻后,检察官重新寻找案件突破口:每个新生儿都必须接种疫苗,注射时间距出生日期往往很近,既然原始出生记录已经缺失,新生儿的防疫登记就成了相对可靠的时间证明。程小军所在村委会提供了一份证明,记录着当年村里上户口时,将程小军与他大伯家的儿子登记成双胞胎,出生日期均记录为1998年3月5日。成某的解释是,当年为了躲避二胎罚款,将儿子的户口登记在了他大伯家,两个孩子差不了几天。此时,防疫登记方面也有了线索,警方找到了当年辖区变更前的防疫站记录——“清浦区儿童计划免疫接种记录簿”和当时的登记人。记录簿上所载程小军接种新生儿乙肝疫苗时间为1997年9月3日,出生日期为1997年9月2日,与其小学学籍卡的日期相符。谁成想,成某对疫苗接种记录矢口否认。对于两个截然不同的出生日期,她解释道,当年他们托人让程小军从乡镇来到市区念小学,学籍登记卡上的日期是受托人所填,他们完全不知情。又称,原本的防疫登记卡已经丢失,为了上小学,他们找熟人重新补了一份防疫登记卡交到防保站,出生日期是按照学籍卡上来填的。巧合的是,程小军的防疫记录恰好是记录簿某一页的最后一行,加上时间久远,无法完全排除作假的可能性。追查成某提供的受托人和防疫登记卡登记人,却发现他们均已去世,无从查起。案件到此再次陷入了僵局。办案检察官始终有一个直觉——程小军极有可能在医院出生,因为这样才能在出生第二天就及时接种疫苗。淮安检方指导警方对乡镇、市区多家医院展开“地毯式”搜查,集中搜索1997年和1998年产妇住院记录。经过多日的高强度查找,警方终于在淮安某妇幼保健院的病案室里找到了证据。医院记录显示,1997年9月2日凌晨,一位名叫“成某”的产妇入院产下一子,其出院记录登记姓名正是“成某”。至此,程小军的出生日期已是板上钉钉,正是1997年9月2日,与其小学学籍卡和防疫登记一致。后经淮安市检察院公诉,法院考虑到案发后,程小军家人已与死者家人达成赔偿意见,遂判处其无期徒刑。扩展视频:与原文无关 未成年兄弟酒后杀人弃尸相关的主题文章:

Comments are closed.